Wednesday, May 05, 2010

US GMO Labeling Position at Codex Could Pose Problem

“More than 80 food processing, farming and consumer organizations have called on officials to revise the US position on draft Codex food labeling guidance, saying it could cause problems for labeling food as GM-free,” notes Caroline Scott-Thomas in

The Codex Committee on Food Labeling (CCFL) is due to meet in Quebec City from May 3-7.  In a draft document, Codex proposes to allow countries to adopt different positions for labeling of genetically modified (GM) foods. But the United States’ position, drafted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA), opposes this, stating that Codex should not “suggest or imply that GM/GE foods are in any way different from other foods” by allowing countries the option of mandatory labeling. The position is due to be presented at the CCFL meeting next month.

The Codex Alimentarius Committee is a United Nations organization that sets food safety and labeling standards, which are those used in settling World Trade Organization disputes.

The letter is available here.


PDM said...

There is an interesting article at the Health Journal Club that relates how genetic engineers in Australia while attempting to create a mouse contraceptive, completely by accident, created an incredibly lethal version of mousepox (i.e the mouse version of smallpox). If anyone is interested you can read on it here.

Enterprise search appliance said...

I have reviewed your Law Firm Blog. You gave me lots of important law information. I will apply this topic in my firm. I have enjoyed reading it.
“Chad Wuertz”