What a shock to find out that Froot is not fruit. What next, no good luck from Lucky Charms? However, I am (pretty) sure Fruity Pebbles do not contain real pebbles.
Kevin Underhill at Lowering the Bar (legal humor, seriously) shares some humor at the expense of yet another consumer alleging being duped into thinking Froot Loops contained real fruit.
“[Plaintiff] was misled by the packaging and marketing, which by design and intent convey the message that the Product contains real, nutritious fruit," alleges Werbel about a product named "Froot Loops." The complaint continues, "[h]ad he known that 'Froot Loops' contained no fruit, he would not have purchased it." This, of course, is pleaded as a class action, and Werbel alleges that the manufacturer's practices with regard to Froot Loops "present a threat to members of the general public . . . ." Oh, the humanity.
By my count, these are the sixth and seventh lawsuits in California against the manufacturers of these two fictitiously named cereals. But hey - just because you are 0-5 and your arguments have been openly mocked by judges as well as a large percentage of the nation's bloggers does not mean you shouldn't give it one or two more tries. It does mean that, presumably, PepsiCo and Kellogg's are highly unlikely to settle, and that in two or three months plaintiffs should be 0-7.
Kevin Underhill swiped at earlier plaintiffs, who alleged they were led to believe that "Crunch Berries" and/or "Froot Loops" are made with real fruit, “I still think this is like claiming emotional distress because you just learned "The Hobbit" isn't a true story.”
In light of this case, SF Weekly has issued a “corporate caveat noting that, while our offices are located at 185 Berry Street, our publication should in no way be considered a nutritious source of fruit.”